No label defined (Q31173)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No description defined
- Differences in Subjective Transition Outcomes Between Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals Who Completed Mandatory Psychiatric Assessment and Those Who Received Gender-Affirmative Medical Treatment in Croatia: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No label defined |
No description defined |
|
Statements
The aim of this study was to evaluate different aspects of transition outcomes in groups of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people based on their transition status. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
We divided the 70 TGD participants (19 individuals assigned male at birth and 51 assigned female at birth) into two groups: those who had completed their psychiatric and psychological evaluation (PPE), which is mandatory in Croatia, and those who had undergone gender-affirming medical treatment (GAMT) (both gender-affirming hormone treatment and gender-affirming surgery). (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
The online survey included sociodemographic questions and a custom-designed nine-item scale. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
The items were specifically designed based on the DSM-5-TR criteria for gender dysphoria to assess subjectively perceived transition outcomes. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
We conducted a factor analysis of the scale followed by structural equation modeling for confirmation. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare group differences. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
The following three-factor structure was confirmed: better functioning, reduced body dysphoria, and satisfaction with decision. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
A positive influence of better functioning on satisfaction with the decision was found. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
In addition, our results showed that TGD individuals who had undergone GAMT scored higher on better functioning than those who had just completed PPE. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
Both groups consistently scored high on satisfaction with the decision, with no statistically significant differences between them. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
Our findings suggest that TGD individuals view gender-affirming medical care as beneficial to their overall functioning. (English)
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. (English)
2024
Ante (English)
Periša (English)
A
20 August 2024
20 August 2024