No label defined (Q30937)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No description defined
- Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life after chest masculinization in transgender men using the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D instrument.
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | No label defined |
No description defined |
|
Statements
Chest masculinization is the most common surgical intervention in transgender men. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
Studies indicate good patient-reported postoperative satisfaction, but only recently has a patient-reported outcome instrument, the BODY-Q Chest module, been developed and validated for this patient group. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
This study aimed to evaluate postoperative patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D after surgical chest masculinization in transgender men. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The data comprised all patients receiving chest masculinization from 2005 to 2018. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The patients were invited by letter to complete the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D questionnaire in May 2020. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
Of the 220 patients invited, 123 completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 56%. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The median chest and nipple scores were 76 and 68 out of 100, respectively. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The number of secondary corrections was negatively associated with the chest score (p value < 0.001). (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The 15D index score was lower compared with the age-standardized male population (p value < 0.001), but similar to the age-standardized female population. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with lower 15D index scores (p value < 0.001). (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
There were no statistically significant differences between the BODY-Q Chest module scores or the 15D index score among the different surgical techniques. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The postoperative satisfaction with chest masculinization was good and in line with previous literature. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
HRQoL resembles that of the reference population. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The periareolar technique is not associated with better satisfaction despite causing less scar burden. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
The negative association between the chest score and number of secondary corrections is unsettling and requires further examination in a prospective setting. (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
2024
Mirjam (English)
Saarinen (English)
M
Sinikka (English)
Suominen (English)
S
Harri (English)
Sintonen (English)
H
Maija (English)
Kolehmainen (English)
M
Kaisu (English)
Ojala (English)
K
24 August 2024
24 August 2024