Antitrans Policy Environment and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Transgender and Nonbinary Adults (Q29936)

From lgbtDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No description defined
  • Antitrans Policy Environment and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Transgender and Nonbinary Adults.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Antitrans Policy Environment and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Transgender and Nonbinary Adults
No description defined
  • Antitrans Policy Environment and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Transgender and Nonbinary Adults.

Statements

Antitrans Policy Environment and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Transgender and Nonbinary Adults. (English)
1 reference
With the increasing legislation restricting health care access for transgender and nonbinary (trans) populations in recent years, there has been limited research on how awareness of and concerns about legislative restrictions and protections influence mental health outcomes. (English)
IMPORTANCE (English)
1 reference
To examine whether awareness of and concerns about the current policy environment regarding trans individuals are associated with depression and anxiety symptoms among trans adults. (English)
OBJECTIVE (English)
1 reference
This study uses cross-sectional data collected between March and April 2023 from the Washington Priority Assessment in Trans Health (PATH) Project, an online study designed by, with, and for trans communities. (English)
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS (English)
1 reference
All participants were trans adults, aged 18 years or older, living in Washington state. (English)
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS (English)
1 reference
Awareness and concerns about the antitrans policy environment. (English)
EXPOSURE (English)
1 reference
The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms, assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire-4. (English)
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES (English)
1 reference
A series of multivariable regression models was used to assess the association between awareness and concerns about the antitrans policy environment and depression and anxiety symptoms. (English)
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES (English)
1 reference
Models were adjusted for covariates, including demographics, social marginalization, and health care experiences. (English)
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES (English)
1 reference
A total of 797 participants (653 women [81.93%]; 455 aged 18-29 years [57.09%]) were included. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
The majority screened positive for current depression (689 individuals [86.45%]) and anxiety (686 individuals [86.07%]) symptoms. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Trans individuals who were concerned or worried about their rights being taken away (vs not) had significantly higher odds of current depression symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.08-2.54), as well as current anxiety symptoms (aOR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.63-4.36). (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Those who knew (vs did not know) about state-level protective legislation had significantly lower odds of current depression symptoms (aOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.67), as well as current anxiety symptoms (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25). (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
When examining interaction effect estimates, trans individuals who correctly knew about the protective policies and were not worried about having their rights taken away reported the lowest odds of depression and anxiety. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
The findings of this cross-sectional study are consistent with research elucidating the negative mental health consequences of policies limiting health care access and provide insights into informing policies and interventions that target trans populations' worsened mental health outcomes as a result of antitrans legislation. (English)
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE (English)
1 reference
1 August 2024
1 reference
1 August 2024
1 reference
7
1 reference
8
1 reference
e2431306
1 reference
e2431306
1 reference
<b>Conflict of Interest Disclosures:</b> Dr Streed reported receiving personal fees from L’Oreal, Everlywell, Research Institute for Gender Therapeutics, and Texas Health Institute outside the submitted work. (English)
1 reference
No other disclosures were reported. (English)
1 reference