Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients (Q32862)

From lgbtDB
Revision as of 00:33, 18 November 2024 by Superraptor (talk | contribs) (‎Added [en] label: Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No description defined
  • Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients
No description defined
  • Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients.

Statements

Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from double- to single-incision mastectomy with free nipple grafts in 352 transgender and non-binary patients. (English)
1 reference
Double-incision mastectomy (DIM) with free nipple grafts (FNG) is a common technique employed in gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM), but is associated with a high scar burden. (English)
BACKGROUND (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Intraoperatively, the surgeon may opt for a single-incision mastectomy (SIM) along the inframammary folds (IMF) to optimize aesthetic outcomes. (English)
BACKGROUND (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
This study sought to identify factors predictive of intraoperative conversion. (English)
BACKGROUND (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
From February 2018 to November 2022, TGNB patients who underwent GAM at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. (English)
METHODS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Data regarding patient characteristics, perioperative details, postoperative complications, and aesthetic satisfaction were collected. (English)
METHODS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
A total of 352 patients were identified. (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Median age and body mass index (BMI) were 25.0 years (IQR: 9.0) and 28.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (IQR: 8.5), respectively. (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Most patients received IMF incisions (n = 331, 94.0%); of whom, 66 (19.9%) underwent intraoperative conversion from DIM to SIM with FNG. (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Larger breast cup-size (p < 0.001) and a greater degree of ptosis (p = 0.002) preoperatively were significantly associated with intraoperative conversion to SIM. (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
There was no significant association between intraoperative conversion and the ratio of intermammary distance to the width of the chest wall (p = 0.086). (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Overall complication rates were significantly higher among patients with diabetes mellitus (p = 0.015) and a greater degree of ptosis (p = 0.018). (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
77.8% (n = 274) of patients were satisfied with their aesthetic outcome. (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
NPWT usage was associated with higher rates of aesthetic satisfaction (83.6% vs. 77.8%; p = 0.005). (English)
RESULTS (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
Patients with larger breast cup size and greater degree of ptosis should be counseled preoperatively that they may be at a higher risk of conversion to a singular incision. (English)
CONCLUSION (English)
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (English)
1 reference
August 2024
1 reference
August 2024
1 reference
95
1 reference
28-32
1 reference
28
1 reference
32
1 reference
S1748-6815(24)00311-5
1 reference