(Q33304)
Statements
Legislation banning gender-affirming medical care (GAMC) for minors is inconsistent with the Consensus Recommendations for Pediatric Decision-Making (Salter et al. (English)
Gender dysphoria is a medical condition, and GAMC promotes adolescents' health interests. (English)
The evidence for GAMC is comparable to the evidence for other types of pediatric medical care. (English)
Parents are permitted to consent for similar risks in the treatment of other conditions. (English)
Evaluation of the potential benefits, risks, and treatment alternatives is contingent on individual patients' clinical conditions and adolescents' and their parents' values and preferences. (English)
Such decisions are within the scope of parental discretion and should be made through shared decision-making with health-care providers. (English)
Parents' declining GAMC does not inherently create a significant risk of serious imminent harm required to justify state intervention. (English)
Usurping parental discretion for GAMC is unjust: it treats this medical care differently than other comparable types of medical care without sufficient justification. (English)
Armand H (English)
Matheny Antommaria (English)
AH