(Q30473)

Revision as of 18:20, 10 November 2024 by Superraptor (talk | contribs) (‎Added [en] alias: Military Family Physicians' Readiness to Provide Gender-Affirming Care)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Statements

Military Family Physicians' Readiness to Provide Gender-Affirming Care: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study. (English)
1 reference
Family physicians are increasingly more likely to encounter transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients requesting gender-affirming care. (English)
PURPOSE (English)
1 reference
Given the significant health inequities faced by the TGD community, this study aimed to assess changes in military-affiliated clinicians' perspectives toward gender-affirming care over time. (English)
PURPOSE (English)
1 reference
Using a serial cross-sectional survey design of physicians at the 2016 and 2023 Uniformed Services Academy of Family Physicians conferences, we studied participants' perception of, comfort with, and education on gender-affirming care using Fisher's Exact tests and logistic regression. (English)
METHODS (English)
1 reference
Response rates were 68% (n = 180) and 69% (n = 386) in 2016 and 2023, respectively. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Compared to 2016, clinicians in 2023 were significantly more likely to report receiving relevant education during training, providing care to >1 patient with gender dysphoria, and being able to provide nonjudgmental care. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
In 2023, 26% reported an unwillingness to prescribe gender-affirming hormones (GAH) to adults due to ethical concerns. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
In univariable analysis, female-identifying participants were more likely to report willingness to prescribe GAH (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.7-4.1) than male-identifying participants. (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Willingness to prescribe was also associated with ≥4 h of education (OR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.1-4.2) compared to those with fewer than 4 h, and those who reported the ability to provide nonjudgmental care compared to those who were neutral (OR = 0.09, 95%CI = 0.04-0.2) or disagreed (OR = 0.11, 95%CI = 0.03-0.39). (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Female-identifying clinicians were more likely to agree additional training would benefit their practice (OR = 5.3, 95%CI = 3.3-8.5). (English)
RESULTS (English)
1 reference
Although military-affiliated family physicians endorsed more experience with and willingness to provide nonjudgmental gender-affirming care in 2023 than 2016, profound gaps in patient experience may remain based on the assigned clinician. (English)
CONCLUSIONS (English)
1 reference
Additional training opportunities should be available, and clinicians unable to provide gender-affirming care should ensure timely referrals. (English)
CONCLUSIONS (English)
1 reference
Future research should explore trends across clinical specialties. (English)
CONCLUSIONS (English)
1 reference
2024
1 reference
2024
1 reference
15
1 reference
21501319241264193
1 reference
21501319241264193
1 reference
unknown value
1 reference
21501319241264193
1 reference
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. (English)
1 reference
Dr. Roberts has previously received funding from Organon for contraception research (Organon investigator initiated grant program). (English)
1 reference
she is no longer funded by Organon. (English)
1 reference